|
In Ritual Sins one wonders why Anne Stuart continues to create
characters who are so hard to care about. Is it because she is more of a
realist than anyone else, or is she merely relentless in her continued
portrayals of the dark side of human nature?
Having read The Romance Reader's archived reviews of some of her other works, I
discovered I am not alone in finding her characters hard to like. BUT
WAIT...let's be fair.
Picture the hero Luke Bardell: a victim of an abusive childhood, who
is convicted of manslaughter arising out of a bar fight. In prison he
further matured into a consummate con artist who founded the "The
Foundation of Being." Is this your average likable person? He has crafted
his foundation as a 'philosophy of living' rather than as a religious cult.
Charismatic, he has led "The Foundation" in highly successful efforts in
fund raising and in becoming the sole beneficiary of dearly departed
wealthy believers.
And then there is the heroine Rachel Connery. Another victim of abusive
upbringing, her abuse was both sexual and emotional turning her into a
frigid, frustrated woman, who not only does not trust anyone, but also
lacks the most basic ability to make friends. Is it truly not more
plausible that she is this gritty, abrasive being, or should Stuart have
followed the formula and created a character who is indistinguishable on
the outside and bravely suffering on the inside?
Clearly, this author made her choice to adhere to stark realism.
Rachel's mother becomes a follower of "The Foundation of Being" and while
living there, contracts cancer, dies, and leaves her entire estate of 12
1/2 million dollars to Luke and the Foundation. Hurt, betrayed and enraged,
Rachel tries to have the bequest set aside. Failing in court, she accepts
Luke's invitation to visit the Foundation.
From the onset, the conflict is sharply defined. Luke intends to totally
subjugate Rachel's body and soul; Rachel intends to destroy Luke. The
secondary characters are well defined, and help move the action along in
well-transitioned scenes. Although these characters have their own
agendas, and offer strong, forceful sub plots, they are not intrusive.
The author has written a well structured and mechanically intact story.
The dynamics of each scene are varied, and it moves forward with well-used
imagery. It is a strongly visual novel, with a few graphic sex scenes. The
dialogue is lively, expressing succinctly all the individuals' feelings and
beliefs as, they grow and change.
When one balances dark, realistic, unlovable characters against technically
superior writing, fairness dictates an award of 4 stars.
--Thea Davis
|